Published
Wednesday, August 6, 2025
Written By
Confluence Group
Category
Operational & Regulatory Compliance
At Confluence, connecting capital with opportunity means going far beyond simple introductions or surface-level checks. Our approach is built on trust, care, and meaningful relationships, qualities that serve as the backbone of our platform. In the alternative investment landscape crowded with claims and fast-moving trends, trust isn’t presumed, it’s earned. Every step of our verification process is guided by rigorous standards for third-party audits, robust risk management, validated track records, and a deep dive into the environment and team behind each strategy. Our foundational belief is that capital deserves the highest standards of care, and relationships grow strongest when rooted in integrity. Allocators working with us expect more than strong returns, they expect clarity, operational resilience, and unwavering transparency at all times. That’s why a fund manager cannot join our curated network until we have scrutinized every vital element: their audit trail, risk framework, strategic methodology, operational environment, and the strength of the people behind the process.
We start every journey with a transparent, thorough intake process. Managers are invited to share a detailed profile, but we don’t just scan a CV. What we seek is the story behind the numbers: the methodology that underpins their strategy, the real “trade plan,” and the philosophy that drives every allocation and de-risking decision. Is this a systematic, market-neutral, or discretionary approach? We verify that the trade plan isn’t just theoretical but grounded in clear, logical processes, supported by robust documentation and past performance.
Here, a verified and audit-ready track record is essential. Submissions are cross-checked against third-party audit reports, leaving no room for vague or unsubstantiated claims.
Step Two: Documentary Evidence. Trust, But Always Verify
Nothing builds reliability like documentary evidence. At Confluence, our requirements for independent third-party audits are unyielding. Performance results are cross-referenced with bank, broker, or prime brokerage statements, and every reported return must be reconcilable.
Due diligence also covers custodian arrangements, who holds the assets, and under what terms? The environment in which a fund operates, from regulatory filings to liquidity provider workflows, is exhaustively checked. Every KYC/AML protocol must hold up under scrutiny, ensuring the platform remains safe, transparent, and fully compliant.
Step Three: Risk Management at the Core
Robust risk management is a non-negotiable at Confluence. Our compliance teams examine every facet: from the presence of hard and soft stop-limit controls to frameworks for counterparty risk, liquidity, and drawdown response. We ask: does the fund have a well-tested trade plan for every market environment? Are slippage, stress testing, and performance under duress part of their methodology?
This risk lens extends to both quantitative and qualitative aspects, ensuring that statistical metrics and scenario analyses are matched by a culture of vigilance and accountability within the team.
Step Four: The Power of Track Record Verification
A sophisticated track record forms the linchpin of manager credibility. We insist on performance data that’s not only comprehensive and consistent, but independently audited. Managers must show more than aggregate numbers: we expect granular history, clear explanations of outlier events, and disclosures of all changes in methodology or environment that could influence returns. With the help of third-party verification, we safeguard against “cherry-picking” and only onboard managers who can prove every claim.
This extends to strategy methodology, whether it’s a rules-based quantitative model, a holistic market-neutral approach, or a discretionary play. We verify not just “what” performed, but “how” and “why.”
Step Five: The Team, the Environment, and the Human Factor
No fund is better than its team and the environment in which it operates. At Confluence, we dig deep into the people behind the returns: Who are the leaders? What experience do they bring? How do they handle stress, adapt to change, and communicate with stakeholders? Operational due diligence encompasses the whole picture, including teamwork, infrastructure, and culture.
We inspect the synergy between managers, their risk and compliance officers, and trading desks. Is there transparency? Are they supported by proven systems and custodian frameworks? Only those managers whose environment fosters discipline and adaptability secure a place in our network.
Step Six: Screening in Action. A Real Case Study
These principles come alive in every screening. Not long ago, a global macro manager approached us, boasting a strong performance record and transparent, audit-ready data. During our review, we noticed a reporting discrepancy linked to a shift in custodial relationships and team structure in year three. Rather than shy away, the manager provided direct bank confirmations, independent audit statements, and a detailed timeline of their trade plan adjustments and changes in operational environment.
Our risk review found robust scenario planning and stop-limit policies, while the team’s open engagement and thorough documentation closed every gap. Only after we had covered every angle: track record, methodology, risk management, and custodial honesty, did we approve onboarding, documenting every step for ongoing monitoring and allocator reference.
Step Seven: Ongoing Oversight and Relationship Maintenance
The journey doesn’t end at onboarding. Managers must submit regular factsheets and investor memos. Random audits, backtesting, and open feedback channels ensure continuous quality and reliability. Any anomaly, be it in reported returns, risk controls, or team dynamics, triggers a re-evaluation, safeguarding the interests of allocators.
Frequently Asked Questions
Read More Articles
